[ view full size ]
Version 1 added on 12/03/06 by treesquirrel12
Favorite this Author (must be logged in to use)
Comments
(0) » REPLY «#5. Gunslinger 
@ 12:48PM 12/03/06
[re: v1] | Looks pretty good. My only complaint is that the name of the title is Army of Two yet you only show the one guy on the front. |
(0) » REPLY «#6. treesquirrel12 @ 12:58PM 12/03/06
[re: v1] | #5, well the other guy is on the back. and for some reason I can't update it cause its bigger then 1 MB :( but I do acknowledge that typo. |
(0) » REPLY «#7. E_G @ 1:13PM 12/03/06
[re: v1] | I like the guys divided onto the different sides, like Ghast's Kane & Lynch' seem kind of artistic in that sense but Gunslinger was right in the way that it does'nt represent the front on it's own as much as it could, also yeah the small typo should be fixed, did'nt really bother me though. |
(0) » REPLY «#8. werdney 
@ 2:14PM 12/03/06
[re: v1] | I think it should be "more essential than one..." instead of "more essential.......than one" Still, 5/5 |
(0) » REPLY «#9. treesquirrel12 @ 2:16PM 12/03/06
[re: v1] | like I said I can't fix anything because the updated version is over 1MB |
@ 2:53PM 12/04/06 (0) » REPLY «#11. WickedGamer1 
@ 6:40PM 12/04/06
[re: v1] | try saving it in a different format, or maybe "save for web"? im not sure if GIMP has that feature though... |
@ 7:24PM 12/04/06
(0) » REPLY «#14. DeathSpawn11 
@ 8:51PM 03/19/07
[re: v1] | #13, wow thats the second box they've stolen from me o_O they took my Unreal 3 box too. PLUS this was stolen by someone in a contest for gamespot. I guess I gotta mark these now :( |
(0) » REPLY «#15. lord_arcanus 
@ 11:39AM 03/20/07
[re: v1] | you know, wouldn't it be better if both of the characters were on the front? since it is Army of TWO... |
@ 11:46AM 09/23/07 (0) » REPLY «#17. vinmarhall1 @ 8:52PM 01/01/08
[re: v1] | this is awesome, if only we could get more people to fvorite it |
(0) » REPLY «#18. xIAMHUNTERx @ 10:33PM 01/01/08
[re: v1] | #17, I sincerely doubt a lot of people are going to favorite this. |
(0) » REPLY «#19. DeathSpawn11 @ 10:39PM 01/01/08
[re: v1] | #18, what? you have something against my old boxes? =P |
(0) » REPLY «#20. xIAMHUNTERx @ 10:46PM 01/01/08
[re: v1] | #19, Not at all, I just don't think it's that good. :P To be honest, I really would have never thought that you were treesquirrel12. |
(0) » REPLY «#21. vinmarhall1 @ 3:20PM 01/02/08
[re: v1] | #19, deathspawn is treesquirrel? i never knew that |
(0) » REPLY «#22. DeathSpawn11 @ 3:28PM 01/02/08
[re: v1] | #21, ya, I got tired of the squirrel thing eventually and I didn't know at the time that you could've asked Reed for a name change, so I made a new account. I never use my Treesquirrel account these days, the last time I did was for a tiny joke. |
Comment Rules:
Comments are meant to provide the author with feedback on their work. Constructive criticism is the rule! If you merely say "this sucks!" or attack the author, your comment will be deleted and you will be banned if continued. Do not bump your own box, and do not beg for comments and favorites.
You must make an effort to spell correctly and use proper grammar. If you can't be bothered to post coherently and spell out "you" instead of "u" (as an example), don't bother posting at all.
[re: v1]